Browse > Home / Aeronautics News / Boeing KC-767 Tanker Cost Advantage Grows as Fuel Prices Soar

Boeing KC-767 Tanker Cost Advantage Grows as Fuel Prices Soar

Written by thomas · Filed Under Aeronautics News 

July 17, 2008

thomas

ST. LOUIS, July 16 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — As the U.S. military
expresses concern over escalating fuel costs stressing defense budgets,
Boeing (NYSE: BA) reports that the U.S. Air Force could pay as much as $44
billion more in fuel bills over 40 years to operate a fleet of 179 Airbus
A330-200 aerial refueling tankers, compared with a similar number of
tankers based on the Boeing 767-200ER.

This assessment is based on a Conklin & de Decker Aviation Information
study, funded by Boeing, that calculated the Air Force’s cost with oil at
$130 per barrel, $150 per barrel and $200 per barrel(1). Oil prices hit a
record high last week above $147 a barrel, and many analysts expect prices
to continue climbing. Escalating fuel costs are a critical military
concern. As the largest consumer of fuel in the Department of Defense
(DOD), the Air Force, for example, spends an additional $600 million
annually for each $10 increase in the price of a barrel of oil, spending
approximately $6.6 billion on aviation fuel costs in 2006 alone.

“Boeing’s primary focus and objective, as always, is on our customers’
operational needs — and affordable life cycle cost is a key component to
any aircraft acquisition,” said Dave Bowman, vice president and general
manager of Boeing Tanker Programs. “This is even more evident today as our
Air Force customer seeks the most affordable and capable solution.”

Conklin & de Decker, an independent aviation research company, recently
recalculated fuel price costs for the Boeing 767-200ER and the Airbus
A330-200, popular commercial twin-aisle aircraft that are being converted
to military aerial refueling tankers. The larger, heavier A330 is less
fuel-efficient than the 767-200ER and, as a result, consumes 24 percent
more fuel per trip than the 767-200ER. The study also factored in estimated
costs of refining, transportation, storage, handling and fueling the
aircraft.

The Air Force’s Request for Proposals (RFP) called for a highly
capable, medium-sized, low-risk and low-cost refueling tanker to replace
its aging fleet of KC-135 tankers. However, on Feb. 29, the Air Force
selected Northrop Grumman-EADS to build 179 next-generation tankers based
on the A330. The DOD called for a recompetition after the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) urged the Air Force to reexamine 10 of 15
significant issues in Boeing’s protest of the contract award. Among the
sustained issues, the GAO concluded that fuel costs needed reevaluation.
The report stated that “even a small increase in the amount of fuel that is
burned per hour by a particular aircraft would have a dramatic impact on
the overall fuel costs.” The Air Force is now preparing a new RFP for an
expedited competition.

For a copy of the Conklin & de Decker fuel study, visit
http://www.globaltanker.com.

A unit of The Boeing Company, Boeing Integrated Defense Systems is one
of the world’s largest space and defense businesses specializing in
innovative and capabilities-driven customer solutions. Headquartered in St.
Louis, Boeing Integrated Defense Systems is a $32.1 billion business with
71,000 employees worldwide.

(1) International Energy Agency (complete citation)

SOURCE Boeing

» Próximo Post - Hamilton Sundstrand Completes Acquisition of REVIMA APU from EADS Sogerma
« Post Aneterior - Lockheed Martin Enhances Farnborough-Based Swift Laboratory

Comments

¿Tiene algo que decir?

You must be logged in to post a comment.